![]() 10/18/2018 at 18:08 • Filed to: portofino | ![]() | ![]() |
Who thinks the Portofino is a great-looking coupe, and the best looking Fezza for sale right now.
![]() 10/18/2018 at 18:15 |
|
![]() 10/18/2018 at 18:18 |
|
I’m going to be honest, I didn’t even know that was a thing until this post.
![]() 10/18/2018 at 18:18 |
|
You and Doug. I would probably feel differently if i saw it in person but in pictures its a big bag of meh to me.
![]() 10/18/2018 at 18:21 |
|
It isn’t bad, but I much prefer the F12
![]() 10/18/2018 at 18:21 |
|
Nope
![]() 10/18/2018 at 18:22 |
|
It’s the California T’s successor.
![]() 10/18/2018 at 18:22 |
|
The F12 is dead.
![]() 10/18/2018 at 18:25 |
|
I still like it most of modern Ferrari
![]() 10/18/2018 at 18:31 |
|
It's pretty damn good looking. I am not a Ferrari fan, but that sure is pretty.
![]() 10/18/2018 at 18:50 |
|
I didn’t really like the original California but this looks nice. The F12 tdf is probably my favourite modern Ferrari, though.
![]() 10/18/2018 at 18:59 |
|
I like the TDF, but it looks so much like a Z06 especially both in yellow
![]() 10/18/2018 at 19:02 |
|
812 or bust
![]() 10/18/2018 at 19:04 |
|
Well shit, I guess if life doesn’t go quite right I can get a Z06 and some Ferrari badges.
It’s a horrible idea, but still not as bad as the early Chevy Cruze with BMW badges that I saw outside the Uber office near my workplace.
![]() 10/18/2018 at 19:05 |
|
Not a truly horrible idea....
Omg why would anyone do that?!
![]() 10/18/2018 at 19:08 |
|
Much like a Dino, it knows where to be overstated and where to be understated. It’s still a little too modern wires-under-cloth styling to be perfect to my eye, but it looks really good.
Haven’t done a ferroni model rundown lately so I don’t know what to compare it to, but from the examples in thread, you could be right.
![]() 10/18/2018 at 19:17 |
|
I like it a lot too. Not as much as the 812 or the F12 but it's a lot better looking than the California. Especially the rear
![]() 10/18/2018 at 19:48 |
|
![]() 10/18/2018 at 19:49 |
|
![]() 10/18/2018 at 20:20 |
|
It’d actually be pretty convincing if I didn’t actually know this was a C7. To anyone with minimal knowledge of cars this could really be a Ferrari.
It doesn’t follow the Ferrari design language (like circular rear taillamps) but again, someone with little knowledge wouldn’t catch it anyway.
![]() 10/18/2018 at 20:31 |
|
I think it’s handsome. They finally got the proportions just right.
I never liked the California or the California T. To me, those vehicles served as near misses for people who didn’t qualify for a real Ferrari.
This thing is pretty in its own right and worthy of the little chrome horsey
![]() 10/19/2018 at 00:22 |
|
I like it toi
![]() 10/19/2018 at 00:56 |
|
Actually, you are not the only one .
Portofino and GTC4 Lusso are sneaky... not the glory-seeker Ferraris, but the best looking, most realistically interesting new Ferraris.
Portofino, especially in the metallic dark red, is quite good. sleek, well proportioned, if it has to have the slots and vents, the shapes are interesting and pleasing. The roof and window graphic look good with the roof up. California T was getting good... Portofino is refined a little bit more yet, and even better.
Some examples still s uffer from Ferrari’s use of somewhat bland basic wheel design... but there are remedies for that, optional wheels, and aftermarket wheels .
I REALLY wish there were an affordable copycat of this car... V6 or small V8, with a slick profile and a folding hardtop.
Then again, I really liked this design, when it was Donato Coco’s Lotus Elite concept in 2014... when Lotus was going to revamp it’s entire range... but then didn’t.
![]() 10/19/2018 at 01:00 |
|
this and the GT4. I’ve always loved the California and this looks that little bit better
![]() 10/19/2018 at 10:00 |
|
I’ll agree with you on that one.